Before this May I had been to London, UK, twice. Like most tourists I spent most of my time on the north side of the Thames River. But five years ago my husband Will and I enjoyed a short walk and café meal along the river’s South Bank. So on this third trip we wanted to see more of this side of London and, in particular, visit the rebuilt Globe Theatre, which opened in 1997. On a sunny Sunday morning, we walked from Paul’s Cathedral across the Millennium Bridge to Shakespeare’s Globe and bought tickets for the tour and exhibition.

Me at St. Paul’s

The original Globe Theatre was built in 1598. Actor-playwright William Shakespeare owned a share of the company that chose the location across the river because it was outside of the City of London, which had laws restricting unsavoury activities like theatre and prostitution. Plays of the time had to take place under daytime’s natural lighting, which meant attendees couldn’t be working.

The Globe thrived for 14 years and presented many of Shakespeare’s greatest plays. In 1613, during a performance of Shakespeare’s Henry VIII, a stage cannon misfired, igniting the thatched roof and burning the theatre to the ground. Records state that only one man was hurt, but he was saved when his burning breeches were put out with a bottle of ale. The company built a second Globe with a tiled roof. It’s believed that Shakespeare never wrote for this new Globe, which was closed with all the English theatres in 1642 by the Puritan government. Two years later the Globe was demolished to make space for tenements.

Artist’s rendition of the original Globe

On the tour we learned that the modern Globe was the brainchild of American actor and director Sam Wanamaker. When he first

visited London

in 1949, Wanamaker was appalled to discover the city contained no acknowledgement to the theatre intimately associated with one of the world’s greatest writers. Wanamaker founded the Shakespeare Globe Trust, which raised funds and conducted research on the historical Globe. They discovered that the modern theatre couldn’t be built on the original site, since a historically designated building occupies the spot. So the new Globe is about 750 feet (230 m) away.

The Globe viewed from our Thames River cruise

The Trust’s objective was to construct a Globe as close as possible to the original, using the old building techniques, while taking into account modern fire regulations. The building is open air, with a roof made of reed thatch, based on samples found during the excavation of the original site. I had always assumed the Globe was round, but research determined it was 20-sided polygon. Little was known about the stage, so the designers relied on accounts of other theatres of the time. In the end, today’s Globe is as accurate a reconstruction as current knowledge could make it.

Inside the theatre, we sat on the tiered seats while the guide explained that the stage was designed with three levels. Elizabethan theatre goers would understand that characters descending from the ceiling painted heavenly blue with clouds were good guys, while those rising from a trap door in the floor were evil.

The guide pointed out that the most expensive seats in Shakespeare’s time were located high up on the side tiers, rather than lower and facing the stage, because the wealthy were more interested in being seen rather than having the best view of the show. The area in front of the stage, called the pit or yard, allowed the poor in for a penny. This must have been a smelly place, since the crammed-in people were drinking beer with nowhere else to go to relieve themselves. The modern Globe honours the tradition by selling standing room tickets for £5, but provides bathrooms in the wings. Still, today’s budget attendees must stand for three hours, among a crowd of 500 people and exposed to the elements. Umbrellas aren’t allowed. I would splurge for a seat. Prices range from £19-47 for this summer’s production of Hamlet, which is reasonable compared to London west end theatre. Since the Globe seats are hard with no backs, patrons can rent cushions and seat backs.

I think it would be marvellous to watch a Shakespeare play performed in the setting the playwright had in mind when he wrote his great works. But with so much to do in London, Will and I limited ourselves to the tour, which included a peek at the associated Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, an indoor candlelit theatre inspired by the old Blackfriars Theatre. We ended with a walk through the Globe exhibition about the building reconstruction and the history of Shakespeare’s time. It turns out the Globe name derives from a Latin quote by Petronius “because all the world is a playground,” which Shakespeare evidently borrowed and changed to “all the world is a stage.”

This blog post originally appeared on July 12, 2018, on my publisher’s website in the Books We Love Author BlogSpot.

For those who missed it, here’s my post that appeared on my publisher’s website on June 12th.

One thing I love about travel to the United Kingdom is that I can’t go anywhere without stumbling over a place associated with an author I’ve read or heard about. This May my husband Will and I started our holiday in England at the home of our friend Barb, who lives near Gatwick airport. While researching possible day trips, we discovered that writer Jane Austen had lived in Chawton, Hampshire, about a one hour drive from Barb’s town. Jane Austen’s House Museum is the only home where the author lived and wrote that is open to the public.

Susan & Barb at Jane Austen’s home, which was later divided into flats – hence the boarded up windows and door alterations

I’ve loved Austen’s writing since I studied Pride and Prejudice in high school English. I subsequently re-read the novel several times, watched numerous film versions of it and read all of her other books. Emma is my second favourite. Barb is not a romance reader and had never been drawn to the stories, but she offered to drive us to Chawton. We began our visit to Jane Austen’s former home with a picnic in her garden.

Jane lived in this house with her mother, sister Cassandra and friend Martha Lloyd from 1809-1817. Prior to this the women had rented a smaller place. But a childless couple took a liking to Jane’s oldest brother Edward, adopted him and left him their Chawton estate. Since his obligation was to provide for a widowed mother and husbandless sisters, he offered them the house for life. This was a great step up for the women, who could now live rent free with more disposable income. Their original garden, larger than today’s, provided them with an orchard and vegetable patch.

At the Austen home, we learned that Jane had already drafted her novels when she moved there at the age of 34. Content in this improved environment, she started work on revisions. Another brother, who lived in London, submitted her first polished manuscript to a publisher. Sense and Sensibility by A Lady was published in 1811 to public and critical acclaim. A bedroom in the museum displayed an advertisement for her second novel: Pride and Prejudice by the author of Sense and Sensibility. We asked a volunteer guide why Austen had published anonymously. The guide said that the novel was a fairly new written form at this time. Poetry was the viewed as the only true literary writing, while novel writers were considered somewhat sketchy, especially women writers. The guide added that Austen was known as the books’ author in literary circles, but the public was kept in the dark.

Jane’s writing table, more suitable for quill pen writing than a laptop, stands in front of the grandfather clock.

Jane Austen went on the publish the rest of her novels while living in the Chawton house. The guide believes that Jane would have continued to live there and write more books if she hadn’t become ill and needed to be closer to a hospital. Jane died too young, at age 41 in 1817, probably of Addison’s disease or stomach cancer.

Jane Austen, 1775-1817

The tour left me with the impression that Jane Austen lived a mostly happy life, enhanced by close family connections, friendships and writing satisfaction and success. But her own story shows the constraints for women of her time, forced to carve a fulfilling life in a world skewed toward men. Her novels reflect this experience and may be one reason why they still resonate with people today.

We finished the tour on a fun note–dressing up in period clothing. The next day Will and I left for London. Barb sent us an email saying the visit had inspired her second venture into Austenland, by reading a non-fiction history of Jane Austen’s time. Who knows? Jane might have picked up a new fan.